TÉLÉCHARGER HAMID EL MARDI JADARMIYA 2008 MP3 fichier

Auteur Louise 0 commentaire

HAMID EL MARDI JADARMIYA 2008 MP3 fichier.

MOHAMED EL BERKANI - Jadarmya Mourana Music,Maroc, Rai, chaabi, , Hamid El Mardi , Bouchaib Ziani ,Aziz Boualam ,Said Oueld El Telecharger mp3 Rai Marocain, Skyblog Rai Marocaine, l album complet du of playliste track studio media voix été moroccan. telecharger musique marocaine gratuitement rapidement. Hamid El Mardi est né dans la ville de Barchid, c est l un des chanteurs de chaabi les plus connus du Maroc. Hamid Al Mardy connait le succès grâce à ses.TÉLÉCHARGER HAMID EL MARDI JADARMIYA 2008 MP3
Nom: hamid el mardi jadarmiya 2008 mp3
Format:Fichier D’archive (mp3)
Version:Dernière
Licence:Libre (*Pour usage personnel)
Système d’exploitation: Android. Windows XP/7/10. iOS. MacOS.
Taille:4.30 Megabytes

Hamid el mardi حميد المرضي

Des officiels canadiens ont menacé de poursuivre en justice ceux qui appellent au boycott. De nombreux Républicains sont favorables à des mesures similaires. Une position que nous partageons. Cette somme doit éviter le développement fossile des économies en passant directement aux énergies renouvelables. Les 13,5 milliards de dollars prétendus par Chassin et Oliver sont donc déjà transformés en lourds déficits publics avant même la réalisation des projets de pipeline. Géologie, chercheur en Anthropocène. Heureusement, le Mexique, à deux reprises, est sorti de manière victorieuse de la confrontation avec ses créanciers sous la présidence de Benito Juarez, et plus tard, dans la foulée de la révolution mexicaine dirigée par Emiliano Zapata et Pancho Villa qui ont décrété la suspension du paiement de la dette en

US rules of engagement do allow force to be used against the Taliban, but only in self-defence. US combat operations have continued in Afghanistan but only as part of a separate, smaller counter-terror mission targeting al Qaeda and Islamic State. But the extent of US air attacks conducted outside the counter-terror remit, revealed by the Bureau today, suggests the US has been drawn quietly yet significantly into fighting the Taliban-led insurgency. The military now has explicit permission to proactively support the stretched Afghan security forces on the battlefield.

Under the new policy, the US commander in Afghanistan, General John Nicholson, who took control in March, will be able to assign troops to accompany regular Afghan soldiers at key moments in their offensive campaign.

US commanders will have greater discretion to carry out airstrikes against the Taliban as well.

The extra 2,900 are US soldiers in the country on offensive combat operations as part of a parallel counter-terror mission. They do not elaborate on what threat or what force. Kate Clark of the Afghan Analyst Network, a highly respected think tank said the rise in the proportion of airstrikes against the insurgency was a pragmatic response to a deteriorating situation. That support comes from intelligence, surveillance and help with logistics, as well as close mentoring by US forces, important for boosting moral of the Afghans they work with.

The strike was particularly controversial as US military operations crossed over the border into Pakistan where Mansour was based.

All strikes in Pakistan before this point had been conducted as part of the US covert war on terror operated by the CIA. The May 21 strike, which caused much outcry in Pakistan, was justified by the US as a defensive action. Troops were operating with both mandates during the effort to retake Kunduz. US forces conducted 22 strikes in the city as the Green Berets and Afghan partners battled to liberate the city.

Nine were conducted using counter-terrorism rules, 13 under a self-defence remit. US troops in Afghanistan are due to be cut to just 5,500 by the start of next year. And we anticipate that by offering them more support in the form of advice and assistance, and occasionally accompanying them on their operations, that they are likely to be more effective on the battlefield.

Lhob lmachrouk - ach galoulik - ela chadouna jadarmya Li tba3 lhob. Hamid El Mardi est né dans la ville de Barchid, c est l un des chanteurs de chaabi les plus connus du Maroc. Hamid El Mardi Caâbi Maroc VCD Publié par Music mp3 à Libellés: Chaabi, hamid al mardi, hamid el mardi, Maroc, mp3, music Telecharger avast vlc msn idm cclener emule limewir Maroc VCD Hamid El Mardi - Koulha Bach Mabli - Hamid El Mardi - Jadarmiya - Écouter et Télécharger GRATUITEMENT Hamid el mardi en format MP3. Hamid Al Mardy connait le succès grâce à ses.

The case for or against a British exit from the EU — Brexit — is headline news. Most EU proponents are deeply concerned about these prospects and the repercussions either might have on European unity. Yet, while highly important, neither of them should distract Europe from zooming in on the real issue: the dominant and altogether destructive role of Germany in European affairs today.

It is high time for Europe to contemplate the option of a German exit from the Eurozone — Gexit — since this might be the least damaging scenario for Europe to emerge from its euro trap and start afresh. Of course, it was never meant to be this way.

I have always supported the idea of a common European currency as I believed that it could potentially provide a monetary order that is far superior to the status quo ante of deutschmark hegemony: the Bundesbank — in pursuit of its German price stability mandate — pulling the monetary strings across the continent.

While I have also always held that the euro — the peculiar regime of Economic and Monetary Union agreed at Maastricht — was deeply flawed, I kept up my hopes that the political authorities would reform that regime along the way to make the euro viable. Watching developments over in Europe from afar my hopes are dwindling by the day that the failed euro experiment will usher in reforms that could save it.

Instead, the likelihood of some form of eventual euro breakup seems to be rising constantly. It is undeniable that the euro has turned out to be an instrument of widespread impoverishment rather than shared prosperity.

It seems increasingly unclear for how much longer pro-European politics will be able to somehow cover up the blunder and hold things together — particularly as politics is turning more and more nationalistic and confrontational everywhere.

Monetary stability was seen as a pre-condition for peace and shared prosperity. Today, the Eurozone is on the verge of deflation, domestic demand is still below the level reached eight years ago, and unemployment remains extremely high, especially in over-indebted euro crisis countries.

The troubling truth is that Germany largely determined the Maastricht rules of the game but failed to abide by them. But Greece is too small to matter in any well-designed monetary union while Germany is too big not to matter hugely in any monetary union, especially a poorly designed one. Germany dictated that central bank independence, the primacy of price stability, and the prohibition of excessive fiscal deficits must be the overarching policy principles of EMU.

These principles had secured both price stability and prosperity in post-war West Germany. Pegged nominal exchange rates were key to this outcome though as German competitiveness improved whenever German inflation stayed below trends elsewhere. In this way Germany could always rely on exports as its growth engine and largely abstain from active domestic demand management. For diverging competitiveness positions are not permissible inside a monetary union that is not also a fiscal and transfer union.

Germany accumulated huge claims against its euro partners that were running up ever higher external debts. Essentially the migration of risks from private to public balance sheets was facilitated so as to contain and cover up the damages in creditor countries.

Germany had bailed out its banks for losses suffered on their US subprime adventures. Apparently the German authorities judged that it was an easier sell to bail out its euro partners than organizing another round of bailouts for German financial institutions for losses suffered on their Eurozone adventures.

But bailouts of euro partners had to come along with punishment. Germany prescribed harsh austerity for its partners but refused to share in the rebalancing process by fiscal expansion and higher wage inflation at home. As a result, the rebalancing has been one-sided and deflationary, with unnecessary pain inflicted across the Eurozone.

Germany itself got lucky once more: recovery in the US, UK, China and other emerging markets offset the repercussions of suffocating its Eurozone export market plus. And here we are today with a highly divided euro experience. Outside of Germany the euro means impoverishment and hardship.

Yet political discontent is surging everywhere. Outside of Germany because people increasingly question any sense and fairness in their impoverishment. Wage repression under the euro facilitated a massive shift in income and wealth distribution in Germany too. But how do you convince Germany to change given that Germans were misled to believe that they have done everything right That is the challenge Europe must meet plus. Europe should focus its attention and conversation on how to convince Germany to either change its ways or exit from the euro.

It is no use to pretend that euro breakup is not an option. Without drastic change in policies and institutions it will happen one way or the other anyway. One option is complete breakup with all partners returning to their national currencies. In this case it would be no use pegging to the new deutschmark as that would just repeat the old problem. Another option is that only a certain group of member s leave s.

The fear of Grexit experience last year and earlier escalating euro crises provided a foretaste of the pains that any exiting weak debtor country would go through. Creditors would suffer some unpleasant consequences of debtor country exit and default too though.

Gexit, the departure of the strong, would be less disruptive for the Eurozone as a whole. Germany could declare next Sunday that it re-introduces the deutschmark converting all domestic euro contracts and prices at a 1:1 rate. Perhaps the Dutch and Austrians might consider going along with it, but I leave that possibility aside here.

On Monday morning the Bundesbank would stand by and cheer the new deutschmark surge on the exchanges. The German government would proudly announce to its citizens that they will no longer have to bail out any lazy Europeans but will from now on enjoy the real fruits of their hard-won übercompetitiveness. And so all Germans would live happily ever after. Unshackled from German idiosyncrasies in all matters of macroeconomics, the Eurozone would follow through with my Euro Treasury plan and henceforth smartly invest in their joint future — a future of prosperity rather than impoverishment.

Unhindered by German pressures and supported by constructive rather than destructive fiscal policy the ECB would continue its current course and re-establish price stability in a couple of years. If they preferred to return to their national currencies, that would be the other avenue to climb out of their euro trap. I personally think that, if the Euro Treasury were established, the members of the Eurozone ex Germany would be better off with the euro.

But that is their choice to make. More than 155 financial institutions have invested billions of dollars in companies making cluster bombs, weapons banned under international law because of their impact on civilians, an advocacy group said Thursday, according to Reuters.

They leave behind large numbers of unexploded ordnance, which can kill or maim civilians long after a war has ended. According to monitors, the weapons have been used recently in Yemen, Sudan, Ukraine, Libya and Syria.

The weapons are banned under the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which has been signed by 119 states and came into force in The majority of firms named by PAX—which includes banks, pension funds and insurance companies—are from countries which are not party to the convention, including the United States, China and South Korea.

One of the largest of these is U. JPMorgan officials declined to comment. NATO is a threat to world peace. Its incessant war games and its addiction to antagonising the Russian bear are putting the future of the world in jeopardy. Instead of advocating the abolition of NATO however, one of the most influential think tanks in the US is pushing for the further integration and consolidation of this Cold War relic.

But with Russia forming two new divisions in its western military region, which borders the Baltic states, 4,000 forward-stationed troops may not be enough to deter a potential attack. The idea of a military Schengen for NATO member states has increasingly being advocated in recent months by defense ministers and military commanders. Under the guise of deterring Russian aggression, the US is pushing for a deepening of the alliance, and further undermining the sovereignty of each member state.

The abolition of NATO is what is needed to move the world closer to peace, not the further integration of this nefarious arm of Western imperialism. After 15 years of grinding war with no obvious end in sight, U. But the pundit outrage may be misplaced. Focusing on Washington rather than on distant war zones, it becomes clear that the military establishment does indeed have a strategy, a highly successful one, which is to protect and enhance its own prosperity.

Given this focus, creating and maintaining an effective fighting force becomes a secondary consideration, reflecting a relative disinterest — remarkable to outsiders — in the actual business of war, as opposed to the business of raking in dollars for the Pentagon and its industrial and political partners.

Examples abound across all the services. The most recent of these was delivered during his visit — the first by an American president — to Hiroshima last month. They serve no useful purpose beyond deterring putative opponents from using them, for which an extremely limited number would suffice. During the Berlin crisis of , for example, when the Soviets possessed precisely four intercontinental nuclear missiles, White House planners seriously contemplated launching an overwhelming nuclear strike on the USSR.

Despite this self-evident truth, the U. The drive to develop and build such systems on the irrational pretense that nuclear war fighting is a practical proposition persists today. The ultimate cost of this new nuclear arsenal in its entirety is essentially un-knowable. In reality, though, the true bill that will come due over the next few decades will almost certainly be multiples of that.

The idea for such a defense, in fact, dates back to the s, but Reagan boosted it to prominence. The record suggests, however, that faced with the undeviating strategic thinking of the military establishment and its power to turn desires into policy, he has simply proven as incapable of altering the Washington system as his predecessors in the Oval Office were or as his successors are likely to be.

Traditionally, such waves start to form at times when the military is threatened with possible spending cutbacks due to the end of a war or some other budgetary crisis.

Inevitably, when it came time to actually buy all those fancy new systems, there was insufficient money in the defense budget plus. This had the desired effect — at least from the point of view of Pentagon — of generating a raft of media and congressional horror stories about the shocking lack of preparedness of our fighting forces and the urgent need to boost its budget plus. This pattern would recur at the beginning of the s when the Soviet Union imploded and the Cold War superpower military confrontation seemed at an end.

As Spinney points out, each successive bow wave crests at a higher level, while military budget cuts due to wars ending and the like become progressively more modest. The latest nuclear buildup is only the most glaring and egregious example of the present bow wave that is guaranteed to grow to monumental proportions long after Obama has retired to full-time speechmaking. An Irishman, he has covered national security topics in this country for many years.

It is not an easy task—one of the lessons of the late s is that responses to crises at hand which are intended to be temporary can quickly become permanent and lock succeeding leaders and administrations into the confrontation which is then passed on, as it were, from generation to generation. Russian actions also indicate that NATO is not viewed as a unitary actor, which indeed it is not. Each of those sets of countries represents a faction within NATO with its all interests and the ability to pursue them independently of the rest of NATO.

It would be a mistake to believe that Warsaw, Ankara, Berlin, Paris, etc. Nevertheless, they do have a certain commonality of interests, for otherwise NATO would have long fallen apart. In regards to Washington, the structure of preferences looks something like this, again, in reverse order of preferability. Given the problem at hand, the various and disparate military measures undertaken by the Russian Federation in the last couple of years that have been chronicled in various issues of the Russia Defense Report should be viewed as pieces of a larger puzzle.

Is this approach, now at least two years in the offing, working The shooting in Orlando, Florida, is not about homosexuals, or Muslims, or assault rifles. It is about waging aggressive warfare overseas, empowering the domestic police state, and electing a warmongering President. Further, she observes that propagandizing the public includes films i. When people are shocked by a real or man-made event, they can be easily manipulated to support wars, or neoliberal market schemes, or any number of toxic agendas.

Los Angeles Offres sur les hôtels: Served with flame-roasted salsa. TÉLÉCHARGER HAMID EL MARDI JADARMIYA MP3. Ecouter et Télécharger MP3 Lhob Lmachrouk - Ach Galoulik - Ela Chadouna Jadarmya de l album Andi Gluaib Wahed par Hamid El Mardi gratuitement sur. Hamid El Mardi Sghir Ou Hazit Lham mp3 Écouter et Télécharger la musique Chaabi Marocain gratuitement, jadid Hamid El Mardi , Lhob Lmachrouk - Ach Galoulik - Ela Chadouna Jadarmya.

The intended reaction of the operation is that the synthetic terror event will induce people to seek protection from the state, coupled with aggressive war to bomb the threat out of existence. The solution, or intended result, is already occurring.

Engineered fear and racism have set the stage for the public to be manipulated to accept a covert agenda that it would otherwise reject. The police state apparatus, War Inc. They omit that their specialty is making sure propaganda is added to the informational flow we all depend on. A rational mindset will reject the racism, hatred, and warmongering which are intended off-shoots of these terror events.

Each country will be reinforced by a battalion. The battalions will be under the orders of NATO commanders, and formally deployed on a rotational basis rather than being based permanently in the host countries, but coverage will be continuous and the presence will be maintained permanently.

Mondialisation - Centre de Recherche sur la Mondialisation

The new force is expected to total about 4,000 soldiers, with contributions from other allies. Germany is likely to deploy to Lithuania, the United States to Poland and Britain to Estonia, on a six-to-nine month rotating basis. Canada is expected to command a fourth battalion in Latvia. Other NATO nations will eventually take command responsibilities. France is also sending a company of about 250 troops. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said at the June 14 meeting that the alliance is considering a Romanian offer to command a multinational brigade which could coordinate alliance training and possibly play a deterrent role.

Romania has offered to provide the headquarters for the brigade and is expected to lead the formation. In addition, the United States will increase its military presence in Eastern Europe by deploying an armored brigade. The Army will repair and upgrade its already pre-positioned arms and place them at sites in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany.

Those stocks will be sufficient for another armored brigade to fall in on. The rotating brigade will bring its own equipment. The rotation period will be limited to nine months. An armored brigade combat team comprises about 4,200 troops and includes approximately 250 tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Paladin self-propelled howitzers, plus 1,750 wheeled vehicles. The arguments of NATO officials saying the forces will deploy on temporary basis do not hold water. Actually, stationing forces abroad under the pretext of holding exercises cannot be done on a non-rotational basis anyway, because each unit has an operational cycle that envisions going through exercises.

The announced plans are nothing else but a permanent military presence of substantial forces. The document has played a very important role in the relationship for 19 years.

Poland and the Baltic States are attempting to build a regional anti-aircraft missile shield. It will have to deploy additional military aircraft and Iskander missile systems closer to the border.

The negative development of events is seen as a provocation by Moscow to reduce any chances of a dialogue within the framework of Russia-NATO Council. The stand-off will trigger an arms race.

The inspection June is carried out at a number of weapons and hardware storage facilities, as well as individual military control agencies. After a torrent of multifaceted politically-motivated assumptions about the Orlando shooting which claimed the lives of 50 and left scores more injured, the extent to which the Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI interacted with the suspect, Omar Mateen, before the attacks was partially revealed.

Something we do in hundreds and hundreds of cases all across the country. We then interviewed him twice. He admitted making the statements that his co-workers reported, but explained that he did it in anger because he thought his co-workers were discriminating against him and teasing him because he was Muslim.

In two cases that unfolded just last years, FBI informants would be revealed to have helped plan attacks with suspects, suggest to suspects that they credit ISIS for the attacks as reported by the Intercept, and even helped them in procuring weapons and explosives before finally arresting them. The results of such investigations are often high-profile counterterrorism news stories portraying the investigations as having stopped real attacks. The FBI often opens these cases when suspects with questionable mental health make statements online or to friends, family, or co-workers indicating possible support for terrorist groups or terroristic aspirations.

Comments could range from claims of belonging to a terrorist group or expressing a dislike of or a desire to cause harm to certain groups. Instead of recognizing a potentially dangerous, mentally unstable individual and getting them the help they need, the FBI instead proceeds with a process of entrapping them. They work often for months posing as terrorists, gaining the trust of the suspect, and leading them through elaborate, scripted terror plots.

During the year-long investigation, El Khalifi detonated explosives at a quarry in the capital region with undercover operatives. He is not believed to be affiliated with al-Qaeda, officials said. One can only speculate what — over the course of 10 months — undercover FBI informants said and did with Orlando shooting suspect Omar Mateen and how that may have contributed to his final act of violence years later.

It is possible that contact with undercover informants posing as extremists may have radicalized or at the very least, planted the seeds for the violence Mateen would eventually carry out years later. So far, the FBI refuses to make the details of their previous investigations public. Instead of attempting to hitch our own various personal political causes to this tragedy, make it a priority instead to pursue and demand the truth. The villains we think we fear may pale in comparison to what may have truly sparked this tragedy — and exposing it may be the key to preventing the next tragedy.

War and regime change are the intended result. Islamic jihadism is anathema to Eritrea, whose population of six million on the shores of the Red Sea is about evenly divided between Muslims and Christians. But few people in the United States knew Eritrea existed, much less its secular revolutionary history and politics. The lies stuck, as did the sanctions, even after the UN Human Rights Council conceded there was no further evidence of Eritrean aid to the Shabaab.

Smith laid the legal groundwork for the overthrow of the Eritrean government. National service in Eritrea, as in many other countries, includes not only military duty on the front lines with Ethiopia — which still occupies parts of Eritrea in clear violation of an international arbitration agreement — but also labor in public works projects as well as service in health and education infrastructures.

Most teachers in Eritrea, for example, are national service workers. Lots of folks would call that socialism or nation-building — which is how the Eritreans see it. The Eritreans defend extended national service on grounds of necessity, citing an existential threat from the Ethiopian military, backed to the hilt by Washington.

Economic sanctions have also necessitated that Eritrea mobilize the population to develop its own national resources. However, self-reliance is also a cornerstone of Eritrean domestic development policy, and seen as central to maintaining true national sovereignty and independence.

Indeed, the other Big Lie against Eritrea — that it is the second largest contributor to the waves of refugees risking life and limb to reach Europe — is directly related to European immigration policies, urged on them by the U.

Indeed, economic, political and war refugees from all across Africa claim to be Eritrean because, unlike citizens of any other African country, Eritrean refugees are afforded special status on arrival in Europe as presumptive political refugees who might face torture if returned home.

Cuba policy, the Eritrean exception was designed to weaken and destabilize the country through a brain and human resource drain. Inevitably, however, the policy has made Eritrean identification papers the hottest selling documents on the streets of Khartoum and other refugee gathering points. Europe is awash, as is Israel, with fake Eritreans fleeing various military, political and economic catastrophes — most of them rooted in Euro-American foreign destabilization policies and the global capitalist Race to the Bottom.

If Latin Americans could pass for Cubans, the populations of U. Ethiopians pass most easily as Eritreans, since millions of them share the same ethnic background. About half of Eritreans are Tigrayan, the ethnic group that is the fourth largest in Ethiopia and dominates the ruling party in Addis Ababa. The Eritrean refugee scam is an open secret all across Europe, and is well known to the American and European governments.

The Big Lie is maintained to serve imperial purposes, and will now be deployed to justify an armed assault on Eritrea as an alleged mass enslaver and rogue nation. Eritrea cannot expect a fair hearing from a UN apparatus that is puppeteered from Washington.

The service is not indefinite although for a time and in certain cases it has been prolonged due the already explained existential threat of war. The commission based its findings on the testimony of about 800 alleged Eritreans interviewed in various foreign cities, while ignoring the 42,000 Eritrean expatriates that have petitioned the world body to lift sanctions against their home country. By referring the case to the International Criminal Court, and implicitly threatening military action against Eritrea, the commission has become a warmonger.

Like the American black comedian, Dick Gregory, who, on hearing that President Johnson had declared a war on poverty, ran out onto the street with a hand grenade to throw it at some poor people, I have no idea who the real enemy is, who to throw a grenade at.

How can there be a war against a method of war. But they want us to fight a method and never ask the why or the who. They tell us not to be concerned with why something happens, only how it happens. It has become a euphemism and a justification for all the wars they have waged since.

We have seen it used against Russia. When they same the same thing in Afghanistan, the same holds true, they are fighting a national resistance. The bombings and shootings in Europe, Asia, the US, and Russia are all connected to the real war that is being conducted by the United States against the world it wants to control, and, in fact, can better be described as a war of terror being waged against the rest of us by the United States and its vassal states. You can even say that World War II never did really end.

The acts of terrorism by US proxy elements and forces in Syria and Ukraine for example are a type of hybrid warfare, used both against the targeted country, for instance Syria, Libya and Russia, and a type of hybrid warfare against its own people and the peoples of its allies to create the necessary propaganda to obtain their support for the very wars in which they are the first victims. In other words, they get the people to cut their own throats.

For the result is the same, new oppressive security laws and surveillance, more calls for war on the middle east, and the use of emergency laws, as we see in France, being used to terrorise working people with the threat of harsher working conditions for less pay in order to give industrialists more profit.

Is that not a form of terrorism, class terrorism The American build up of forces around China, is that not an attempt to terrorise the Chinese people with the threat of war unless they kowtow to the American president The American renewal of its nuclear arsenal, the British promise to do the same, the constant threats of world war coming from the foul mouths of the decaying leadership campaigning for the American presidency, the lies and distortion propagated by the western mass media against their own peoples to make them fear even their own shadows, are these not acts of terrorism against the people of the entire world It contains no useful information that can lead to an understanding of events and circumstances.

It is a word used to dope the mind, paralyse thought, to sap the will. Language is an important tool of control of the people. To accept the terms of propaganda used by the powers that want to control us is to surrender to them completely because once we do that we lose the ability think rationally, to analyse, to question, to think for ourselves.

Individual acts of terror, carried out by the lone terrorist or small group are carried out because they have no other political power than to try to frighten the populace. But acts of terror carried out by those factions of society that hold state power proves that they know their objectives and methods are criminal. That is why they have to resort to the terrorism of their own peoples in order to maintain control and dominance.

And this is the state of affairs to which the world has been reduced after a century of war beginning with The Great War, World War I, through the Second, and the Third, euphemistically called the Cold, War, and now the Fourth, and final war that is now on-going and has been since the NATO terrorist bombing of Yugoslavia.

If we want to eliminate terrorism in this world then we have to eliminate the conditions that bring to power those willing to use terrorism to rule. In the United States, a democratic revolution would have to take place, but the disorganised mob that is now the American people is more easily swayed by the demagogues of fascism, like Donald Trump or Hilary Clinton, than by ideas of social and economic justice.

The situation is bleak and getting darker by the day as the violence increases, as the drones assassinate at a distance, as international law is ripped to shreds, as the climate continues to warm and change without any real attempt to stop it, as every day life becomes more precarious each passing day. Maybe someone out there has the answer to all this. Emirati media is now attempting to cover up for the massive failure of UAE operations claiming that the military phase has ended and that it is now merely time for a political phase.

It is unclear whether or not the UAE pullout of Yemen has resulted in any disagreement between the Emiratis and the Saudis. However, the Saudis have recently argued for yet another major push toward Houthi territory so it is clear that, if the UAE does indeed end its military participation in the campaign, the Saudis and the UAE are on very different pages.

On Tuesday, the 10-year German bund slipped into the bizarro-world of negative rates where lenders actually pay the government to borrow their money. Aside from turning capitalism on its head, negative rates illustrate the muddled thinking of central bankers who continue to believe they can spur growth by reducing the cost of cash. Regrettably, the evidence suggests otherwise. Also, global GDP has slowed to a crawl indicating that negative rates are not having any meaningful impact on growth.

They also discourage savings that can be invested in profitable ventures. A negative 10-year bond is less a sign of monetary wizardry than of economic policy failure. Negative rates merely underscore the fact that policymakers are clueless when it comes to fixing the economy.

In the last two weeks, long-term bond yields have been falling at a record pace. Never before have traders paid so much to own trillions of dollars in debt and gotten so little in return.

There are a number of factors effecting bond yields: Fear, that a Brexit could lead to more market turbulence and perhaps another financial crisis.

Pessimism, that the outlook for growth will stay dim for the foreseeable future keeping the demand for credit weak.. And lack of confidence, that policymakers will be able to reach their target inflation rate of 2 percent as long as wages and personal consumption remain flat. All of these have fueled the flight to safety that has put pressure on yields. Their insuperable arrogance to the contrary notwithstanding, the central banks have not abolished the law of supply and demand. Central banks have never intervened in the operation of the markets to the extent they have in the last seven years.

Think about what that means. What they want, is a permanently-hobbled economy that barley grows at 2 percent so they can continue to borrow cheaply in the bond market and use the proceeds to buy back their own shares or issue dividends with the money they just stole from Mom and Pop investors.

Its an attempt to create an economic justification for continuing the same policies into perpetuity. Is there a way to turn this train around and put the economy back on the road to recovery While the political issues are pretty thorny, the economic ones are fairly straightforward.

Ideally that would mean spending it on infrastructure projects that are large, expensive, and useful — the kind of thing that will pay dividends for decades to come but that under ordinary times you might shy away from taking on..

These are all programs that get money circulating through the system fast. They boost growth, raise living standards, and build a better society. Both the Obama administration and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton have endorsed the effort led by Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, who staged a 15-hour filibuster Tuesday and Wednesday, with the backing of most Senate Democrats, to force Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell to agree to a vote on two gun-related amendments to an appropriations bill currently before the Senate.

It is not clear whether the amendments will pass when they come to a vote, now scheduled for Monday, but there will be heavy pressure mounted through the media and by Obama and Clinton, perhaps joined in this effort by the presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

The other would expand the current requirement that gun stores perform background checks on buyers to include gun shows, Internet sellers and other private sellers. If people on the watch list, now denied the right to board an airplane, are then denied the right to buy a gun, what comes next Should they be denied the right to vote What about the right to use the Internet, or drive a car The logic is inexorable, and in the event of new tragedies on the scale of Orlando, such demands will inevitably arise, and will be taken up by various factions in the reactionary political establishment in the United States.

The FBI watch list is a huge database, estimated at 800,000 names, and including, among the many well-publicized errors, a Republican congressman and a four-year-old boy, both from northern California. Another such lawsuit, sponsored by Islamic-American groups, is in federal court in Virginia. Others come from vengeful ex-spouses or people casting suspicion on Arab-Americans.

The statements by leading Democrats in support of the ban on gun purchases have been remarkably blunt in their anti-democratic thrust. In any case, no new laws would be required to arrest them. There are more than a few ironies in this statement.

The AR-15 semi-automatic, which he condemned, is the civilian version of the same weapon that US soldiers use to mow down villagers in Afghanistan and Iraq. As for terrorists having access to weapons, it is the United States and its allies who have funneled arms into Islamic fundamentalist organizations in Libya and Syria, first as part of the war against the government of Muammar Gaddafi, and then as part of the proxy war against the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.

The nearly 10,000 gun homicides a year represent a death toll greater than in many civil wars. El comunicado de prensa del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Costa Rica ver texto completo reproducido al final de esta nota precisa que. Watching developments over in Europe from afar my hopes are dwindling by the day that the failed euro experiment will usher in reforms that could save it.

Instead, the likelihood of some form of eventual euro breakup seems to be rising constantly. It is undeniable that the euro has turned out to be an instrument of widespread impoverishment rather than shared prosperity. It seems increasingly unclear for how much longer pro-European politics will be able to somehow cover up the blunder and hold things together — particularly as politics is turning more and more nationalistic and confrontational everywhere.

Monetary stability was seen as a pre-condition for peace and shared prosperity. Today, the Eurozone is on the verge of deflation, domestic demand is still below the level reached eight years ago, and unemployment remains extremely high, especially in over-indebted euro crisis countries.

The troubling truth is that Germany largely determined the Maastricht rules of the game but failed to abide by them. But Greece is too small to matter in any well-designed monetary union while Germany is too big not to matter hugely in any monetary union, especially a poorly designed one. Germany dictated that central bank independence, the primacy of price stability, and the prohibition of excessive fiscal deficits must be the overarching policy principles of EMU.

These principles had secured both price stability and prosperity in post-war West Germany. Pegged nominal exchange rates were key to this outcome though as German competitiveness improved whenever German inflation stayed below trends elsewhere. In this way Germany could always rely on exports as its growth engine and largely abstain from active domestic demand management.

For diverging competitiveness positions are not permissible inside a monetary union that is not also a fiscal and transfer union. Germany accumulated huge claims against its euro partners that were running up ever higher external debts. Essentially the migration of risks from private to public balance sheets was facilitated so as to contain and cover up the damages in creditor countries. Germany had bailed out its banks for losses suffered on their US subprime adventures.

Apparently the German authorities judged that it was an easier sell to bail out its euro partners than organizing another round of bailouts for German financial institutions for losses suffered on their Eurozone adventures. But bailouts of euro partners had to come along with punishment. Germany prescribed harsh austerity for its partners but refused to share in the rebalancing process by fiscal expansion and higher wage inflation at home.

As a result, the rebalancing has been one-sided and deflationary, with unnecessary pain inflicted across the Eurozone.

Germany itself got lucky once more: recovery in the US, UK, China and other emerging markets offset the repercussions of suffocating its Eurozone export market plus.

And here we are today with a highly divided euro experience. Outside of Germany the euro means impoverishment and hardship. Yet political discontent is surging everywhere. Outside of Germany because people increasingly question any sense and fairness in their impoverishment. Wage repression under the euro facilitated a massive shift in income and wealth distribution in Germany too.

But how do you convince Germany to change given that Germans were misled to believe that they have done everything right That is the challenge Europe must meet plus. Europe should focus its attention and conversation on how to convince Germany to either change its ways or exit from the euro.

It is no use to pretend that euro breakup is not an option. Without drastic change in policies and institutions it will happen one way or the other anyway. One option is complete breakup with all partners returning to their national currencies. In this case it would be no use pegging to the new deutschmark as that would just repeat the old problem.

Another option is that only a certain group of member s leave s. The fear of Grexit experience last year and earlier escalating euro crises provided a foretaste of the pains that any exiting weak debtor country would go through.

Creditors would suffer some unpleasant consequences of debtor country exit and default too though. Gexit, the departure of the strong, would be less disruptive for the Eurozone as a whole. Germany could declare next Sunday that it re-introduces the deutschmark converting all domestic euro contracts and prices at a 1:1 rate. Perhaps the Dutch and Austrians might consider going along with it, but I leave that possibility aside here.

On Monday morning the Bundesbank would stand by and cheer the new deutschmark surge on the exchanges. The German government would proudly announce to its citizens that they will no longer have to bail out any lazy Europeans but will from now on enjoy the real fruits of their hard-won übercompetitiveness. And so all Germans would live happily ever after. Unshackled from German idiosyncrasies in all matters of macroeconomics, the Eurozone would follow through with my Euro Treasury plan and henceforth smartly invest in their joint future — a future of prosperity rather than impoverishment.

Unhindered by German pressures and supported by constructive rather than destructive fiscal policy the ECB would continue its current course and re-establish price stability in a couple of years.

If they preferred to return to their national currencies, that would be the other avenue to climb out of their euro trap. I personally think that, if the Euro Treasury were established, the members of the Eurozone ex Germany would be better off with the euro. But that is their choice to make.

More than 155 financial institutions have invested billions of dollars in companies making cluster bombs, weapons banned under international law because of their impact on civilians, an advocacy group said Thursday, according to Reuters. They leave behind large numbers of unexploded ordnance, which can kill or maim civilians long after a war has ended. According to monitors, the weapons have been used recently in Yemen, Sudan, Ukraine, Libya and Syria. The weapons are banned under the Convention on Cluster Munitions, which has been signed by 119 states and came into force in The majority of firms named by PAX—which includes banks, pension funds and insurance companies—are from countries which are not party to the convention, including the United States, China and South Korea.

One of the largest of these is U. JPMorgan officials declined to comment. NATO is a threat to world peace. Its incessant war games and its addiction to antagonising the Russian bear are putting the future of the world in jeopardy.

Playlist of ahouzar sghir

Instead of advocating the abolition of NATO however, one of the most influential think tanks in the US is pushing for the further integration and consolidation of this Cold War relic.

But with Russia forming two new divisions in its western military region, which borders the Baltic states, 4,000 forward-stationed troops may not be enough to deter a potential attack.

The idea of a military Schengen for NATO member states has increasingly being advocated in recent months by defense ministers and military commanders. Under the guise of deterring Russian aggression, the US is pushing for a deepening of the alliance, and further undermining the sovereignty of each member state.

Abderrahim El Meskini Zaari de l album de l Cheb Bilal et télécharger la belle musique de ses nouvelles Hamid El Mardi - Topic Uploaded 1 year ago Téléchargez USBFIX de El Desaparecido, C xx Double cliques sur le fichier téléchargé pour lancer le processus d installation. Labels: Télécharger le Février Hamid El Mardi - Jadarmiya - Daoudi - chinwi khalwi - amine yarabi amine.

The abolition of NATO is what is needed to move the world closer to peace, not the further integration of this nefarious arm of Western imperialism. After 15 years of grinding war with no obvious end in sight, U.

But the pundit outrage may be misplaced. Focusing on Washington rather than on distant war zones, it becomes clear that the military establishment does indeed have a strategy, a highly successful one, which is to protect and enhance its own prosperity.

Given this focus, creating and maintaining an effective fighting force becomes a secondary consideration, reflecting a relative disinterest — remarkable to outsiders — in the actual business of war, as opposed to the business of raking in dollars for the Pentagon and its industrial and political partners.

Examples abound across all the services. The most recent of these was delivered during his visit — the first by an American president — to Hiroshima last month. They serve no useful purpose beyond deterring putative opponents from using them, for which an extremely limited number would suffice.

During the Berlin crisis of , for example, when the Soviets possessed precisely four intercontinental nuclear missiles, White House planners seriously contemplated launching an overwhelming nuclear strike on the USSR. Despite this self-evident truth, the U.

The drive to develop and build such systems on the irrational pretense that nuclear war fighting is a practical proposition persists today.

The ultimate cost of this new nuclear arsenal in its entirety is essentially un-knowable. In reality, though, the true bill that will come due over the next few decades will almost certainly be multiples of that. The idea for such a defense, in fact, dates back to the s, but Reagan boosted it to prominence.

The record suggests, however, that faced with the undeviating strategic thinking of the military establishment and its power to turn desires into policy, he has simply proven as incapable of altering the Washington system as his predecessors in the Oval Office were or as his successors are likely to be.

Traditionally, such waves start to form at times when the military is threatened with possible spending cutbacks due to the end of a war or some other budgetary crisis.

Inevitably, when it came time to actually buy all those fancy new systems, there was insufficient money in the defense budget plus. This had the desired effect — at least from the point of view of Pentagon — of generating a raft of media and congressional horror stories about the shocking lack of preparedness of our fighting forces and the urgent need to boost its budget plus.

This pattern would recur at the beginning of the s when the Soviet Union imploded and the Cold War superpower military confrontation seemed at an end. As Spinney points out, each successive bow wave crests at a higher level, while military budget cuts due to wars ending and the like become progressively more modest.

The latest nuclear buildup is only the most glaring and egregious example of the present bow wave that is guaranteed to grow to monumental proportions long after Obama has retired to full-time speechmaking.

An Irishman, he has covered national security topics in this country for many years. It is not an easy task—one of the lessons of the late s is that responses to crises at hand which are intended to be temporary can quickly become permanent and lock succeeding leaders and administrations into the confrontation which is then passed on, as it were, from generation to generation.

Russian actions also indicate that NATO is not viewed as a unitary actor, which indeed it is not. Each of those sets of countries represents a faction within NATO with its all interests and the ability to pursue them independently of the rest of NATO. It would be a mistake to believe that Warsaw, Ankara, Berlin, Paris, etc. Nevertheless, they do have a certain commonality of interests, for otherwise NATO would have long fallen apart. In regards to Washington, the structure of preferences looks something like this, again, in reverse order of preferability.

Given the problem at hand, the various and disparate military measures undertaken by the Russian Federation in the last couple of years that have been chronicled in various issues of the Russia Defense Report should be viewed as pieces of a larger puzzle.

Is this approach, now at least two years in the offing, working The shooting in Orlando, Florida, is not about homosexuals, or Muslims, or assault rifles. It is about waging aggressive warfare overseas, empowering the domestic police state, and electing a warmongering President.

Further, she observes that propagandizing the public includes films i. When people are shocked by a real or man-made event, they can be easily manipulated to support wars, or neoliberal market schemes, or any number of toxic agendas. The intended reaction of the operation is that the synthetic terror event will induce people to seek protection from the state, coupled with aggressive war to bomb the threat out of existence.

The solution, or intended result, is already occurring. Engineered fear and racism have set the stage for the public to be manipulated to accept a covert agenda that it would otherwise reject. The police state apparatus, War Inc. They omit that their specialty is making sure propaganda is added to the informational flow we all depend on. A rational mindset will reject the racism, hatred, and warmongering which are intended off-shoots of these terror events.

Each country will be reinforced by a battalion. The battalions will be under the orders of NATO commanders, and formally deployed on a rotational basis rather than being based permanently in the host countries, but coverage will be continuous and the presence will be maintained permanently.

The new force is expected to total about 4,000 soldiers, with contributions from other allies. Germany is likely to deploy to Lithuania, the United States to Poland and Britain to Estonia, on a six-to-nine month rotating basis. Canada is expected to command a fourth battalion in Latvia. Other NATO nations will eventually take command responsibilities. France is also sending a company of about 250 troops. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said at the June 14 meeting that the alliance is considering a Romanian offer to command a multinational brigade which could coordinate alliance training and possibly play a deterrent role.

Romania has offered to provide the headquarters for the brigade and is expected to lead the formation. In addition, the United States will increase its military presence in Eastern Europe by deploying an armored brigade.

The Army will repair and upgrade its already pre-positioned arms and place them at sites in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. Those stocks will be sufficient for another armored brigade to fall in on. The rotating brigade will bring its own equipment. The rotation period will be limited to nine months. An armored brigade combat team comprises about 4,200 troops and includes approximately 250 tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Paladin self-propelled howitzers, plus 1,750 wheeled vehicles.

The arguments of NATO officials saying the forces will deploy on temporary basis do not hold water. Actually, stationing forces abroad under the pretext of holding exercises cannot be done on a non-rotational basis anyway, because each unit has an operational cycle that envisions going through exercises. The announced plans are nothing else but a permanent military presence of substantial forces. The document has played a very important role in the relationship for 19 years.

Poland and the Baltic States are attempting to build a regional anti-aircraft missile shield. It will have to deploy additional military aircraft and Iskander missile systems closer to the border. The negative development of events is seen as a provocation by Moscow to reduce any chances of a dialogue within the framework of Russia-NATO Council.

TÉLÉCHARGER CHEB REDOUANE 2008 MP3 GRATUITEMENT

The stand-off will trigger an arms race. The inspection June is carried out at a number of weapons and hardware storage facilities, as well as individual military control agencies. After a torrent of multifaceted politically-motivated assumptions about the Orlando shooting which claimed the lives of 50 and left scores more injured, the extent to which the Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI interacted with the suspect, Omar Mateen, before the attacks was partially revealed.

Something we do in hundreds and hundreds of cases all across the country. We then interviewed him twice. He admitted making the statements that his co-workers reported, but explained that he did it in anger because he thought his co-workers were discriminating against him and teasing him because he was Muslim.

Mustapha oumguil tarbat ighoudan mp3 telecharger, Hamid El Mardi , Bouchaib Ziani ,Aziz Boualam ,Said Oueld El Houate , Mustapha Bourgogne ,Abidat Rma . Le livre en anglais est disponible en PDF gratuitement et à télécharger ici utilizing the president s famous campaign slogan. MP3 Majid Al Muhandis , Telecharger mp3 de Majid Al Muhandis Majid Al TÉLÉCHARGER HAMID EL MARDI JADARMIYA MP3 GRATUIT .

In two cases that unfolded just last years, FBI informants would be revealed to have helped plan attacks with suspects, suggest to suspects that they credit ISIS for the attacks as reported by the Intercept, and even helped them in procuring weapons and explosives before finally arresting them. The results of such investigations are often high-profile counterterrorism news stories portraying the investigations as having stopped real attacks.

The FBI often opens these cases when suspects with questionable mental health make statements online or to friends, family, or co-workers indicating possible support for terrorist groups or terroristic aspirations.

Comments could range from claims of belonging to a terrorist group or expressing a dislike of or a desire to cause harm to certain groups. Instead of recognizing a potentially dangerous, mentally unstable individual and getting them the help they need, the FBI instead proceeds with a process of entrapping them. They work often for months posing as terrorists, gaining the trust of the suspect, and leading them through elaborate, scripted terror plots.

During the year-long investigation, El Khalifi detonated explosives at a quarry in the capital region with undercover operatives. He is not believed to be affiliated with al-Qaeda, officials said. One can only speculate what — over the course of 10 months — undercover FBI informants said and did with Orlando shooting suspect Omar Mateen and how that may have contributed to his final act of violence years later.

It is possible that contact with undercover informants posing as extremists may have radicalized or at the very least, planted the seeds for the violence Mateen would eventually carry out years later. So far, the FBI refuses to make the details of their previous investigations public.

Instead of attempting to hitch our own various personal political causes to this tragedy, make it a priority instead to pursue and demand the truth. The villains we think we fear may pale in comparison to what may have truly sparked this tragedy — and exposing it may be the key to preventing the next tragedy.

War and regime change are the intended result. Islamic jihadism is anathema to Eritrea, whose population of six million on the shores of the Red Sea is about evenly divided between Muslims and Christians. But few people in the United States knew Eritrea existed, much less its secular revolutionary history and politics. The lies stuck, as did the sanctions, even after the UN Human Rights Council conceded there was no further evidence of Eritrean aid to the Shabaab.

Smith laid the legal groundwork for the overthrow of the Eritrean government. National service in Eritrea, as in many other countries, includes not only military duty on the front lines with Ethiopia — which still occupies parts of Eritrea in clear violation of an international arbitration agreement — but also labor in public works projects as well as service in health and education infrastructures.

Most teachers in Eritrea, for example, are national service workers. Lots of folks would call that socialism or nation-building — which is how the Eritreans see it. The Eritreans defend extended national service on grounds of necessity, citing an existential threat from the Ethiopian military, backed to the hilt by Washington.

Economic sanctions have also necessitated that Eritrea mobilize the population to develop its own national resources. However, self-reliance is also a cornerstone of Eritrean domestic development policy, and seen as central to maintaining true national sovereignty and independence.

Indeed, the other Big Lie against Eritrea — that it is the second largest contributor to the waves of refugees risking life and limb to reach Europe — is directly related to European immigration policies, urged on them by the U. Indeed, economic, political and war refugees from all across Africa claim to be Eritrean because, unlike citizens of any other African country, Eritrean refugees are afforded special status on arrival in Europe as presumptive political refugees who might face torture if returned home.

Cuba policy, the Eritrean exception was designed to weaken and destabilize the country through a brain and human resource drain. Inevitably, however, the policy has made Eritrean identification papers the hottest selling documents on the streets of Khartoum and other refugee gathering points.

Europe is awash, as is Israel, with fake Eritreans fleeing various military, political and economic catastrophes — most of them rooted in Euro-American foreign destabilization policies and the global capitalist Race to the Bottom. If Latin Americans could pass for Cubans, the populations of U.

Ethiopians pass most easily as Eritreans, since millions of them share the same ethnic background. About half of Eritreans are Tigrayan, the ethnic group that is the fourth largest in Ethiopia and dominates the ruling party in Addis Ababa. The Eritrean refugee scam is an open secret all across Europe, and is well known to the American and European governments.

The Big Lie is maintained to serve imperial purposes, and will now be deployed to justify an armed assault on Eritrea as an alleged mass enslaver and rogue nation. Eritrea cannot expect a fair hearing from a UN apparatus that is puppeteered from Washington.

The service is not indefinite although for a time and in certain cases it has been prolonged due the already explained existential threat of war.

The commission based its findings on the testimony of about 800 alleged Eritreans interviewed in various foreign cities, while ignoring the 42,000 Eritrean expatriates that have petitioned the world body to lift sanctions against their home country. By referring the case to the International Criminal Court, and implicitly threatening military action against Eritrea, the commission has become a warmonger.

Like the American black comedian, Dick Gregory, who, on hearing that President Johnson had declared a war on poverty, ran out onto the street with a hand grenade to throw it at some poor people, I have no idea who the real enemy is, who to throw a grenade at. How can there be a war against a method of war. But they want us to fight a method and never ask the why or the who. They tell us not to be concerned with why something happens, only how it happens.

It has become a euphemism and a justification for all the wars they have waged since. We have seen it used against Russia. When they same the same thing in Afghanistan, the same holds true, they are fighting a national resistance. The bombings and shootings in Europe, Asia, the US, and Russia are all connected to the real war that is being conducted by the United States against the world it wants to control, and, in fact, can better be described as a war of terror being waged against the rest of us by the United States and its vassal states.

You can even say that World War II never did really end. The acts of terrorism by US proxy elements and forces in Syria and Ukraine for example are a type of hybrid warfare, used both against the targeted country, for instance Syria, Libya and Russia, and a type of hybrid warfare against its own people and the peoples of its allies to create the necessary propaganda to obtain their support for the very wars in which they are the first victims.

In other words, they get the people to cut their own throats. For the result is the same, new oppressive security laws and surveillance, more calls for war on the middle east, and the use of emergency laws, as we see in France, being used to terrorise working people with the threat of harsher working conditions for less pay in order to give industrialists more profit.

Is that not a form of terrorism, class terrorism The American build up of forces around China, is that not an attempt to terrorise the Chinese people with the threat of war unless they kowtow to the American president The American renewal of its nuclear arsenal, the British promise to do the same, the constant threats of world war coming from the foul mouths of the decaying leadership campaigning for the American presidency, the lies and distortion propagated by the western mass media against their own peoples to make them fear even their own shadows, are these not acts of terrorism against the people of the entire world It contains no useful information that can lead to an understanding of events and circumstances.

It is a word used to dope the mind, paralyse thought, to sap the will. Language is an important tool of control of the people. To accept the terms of propaganda used by the powers that want to control us is to surrender to them completely because once we do that we lose the ability think rationally, to analyse, to question, to think for ourselves. Individual acts of terror, carried out by the lone terrorist or small group are carried out because they have no other political power than to try to frighten the populace.

But acts of terror carried out by those factions of society that hold state power proves that they know their objectives and methods are criminal.

That is why they have to resort to the terrorism of their own peoples in order to maintain control and dominance. And this is the state of affairs to which the world has been reduced after a century of war beginning with The Great War, World War I, through the Second, and the Third, euphemistically called the Cold, War, and now the Fourth, and final war that is now on-going and has been since the NATO terrorist bombing of Yugoslavia.

If we want to eliminate terrorism in this world then we have to eliminate the conditions that bring to power those willing to use terrorism to rule. In the United States, a democratic revolution would have to take place, but the disorganised mob that is now the American people is more easily swayed by the demagogues of fascism, like Donald Trump or Hilary Clinton, than by ideas of social and economic justice.

The situation is bleak and getting darker by the day as the violence increases, as the drones assassinate at a distance, as international law is ripped to shreds, as the climate continues to warm and change without any real attempt to stop it, as every day life becomes more precarious each passing day.

Maybe someone out there has the answer to all this. Emirati media is now attempting to cover up for the massive failure of UAE operations claiming that the military phase has ended and that it is now merely time for a political phase.

It is unclear whether or not the UAE pullout of Yemen has resulted in any disagreement between the Emiratis and the Saudis.

However, the Saudis have recently argued for yet another major push toward Houthi territory so it is clear that, if the UAE does indeed end its military participation in the campaign, the Saudis and the UAE are on very different pages. On Tuesday, the 10-year German bund slipped into the bizarro-world of negative rates where lenders actually pay the government to borrow their money.

Aside from turning capitalism on its head, negative rates illustrate the muddled thinking of central bankers who continue to believe they can spur growth by reducing the cost of cash. Regrettably, the evidence suggests otherwise.

Also, global GDP has slowed to a crawl indicating that negative rates are not having any meaningful impact on growth. They also discourage savings that can be invested in profitable ventures.

Hamid el mardi حميد المرضي

A negative 10-year bond is less a sign of monetary wizardry than of economic policy failure. Negative rates merely underscore the fact that policymakers are clueless when it comes to fixing the economy. In the last two weeks, long-term bond yields have been falling at a record pace. Never before have traders paid so much to own trillions of dollars in debt and gotten so little in return. There are a number of factors effecting bond yields: Fear, that a Brexit could lead to more market turbulence and perhaps another financial crisis.

Pessimism, that the outlook for growth will stay dim for the foreseeable future keeping the demand for credit weak.. And lack of confidence, that policymakers will be able to reach their target inflation rate of 2 percent as long as wages and personal consumption remain flat. All of these have fueled the flight to safety that has put pressure on yields. Their insuperable arrogance to the contrary notwithstanding, the central banks have not abolished the law of supply and demand.

Central banks have never intervened in the operation of the markets to the extent they have in the last seven years. Think about what that means. What they want, is a permanently-hobbled economy that barley grows at 2 percent so they can continue to borrow cheaply in the bond market and use the proceeds to buy back their own shares or issue dividends with the money they just stole from Mom and Pop investors.

Its an attempt to create an economic justification for continuing the same policies into perpetuity. Is there a way to turn this train around and put the economy back on the road to recovery While the political issues are pretty thorny, the economic ones are fairly straightforward.

Ideally that would mean spending it on infrastructure projects that are large, expensive, and useful — the kind of thing that will pay dividends for decades to come but that under ordinary times you might shy away from taking on..

These are all programs that get money circulating through the system fast.

They boost growth, raise living standards, and build a better society. Both the Obama administration and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton have endorsed the effort led by Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, who staged a 15-hour filibuster Tuesday and Wednesday, with the backing of most Senate Democrats, to force Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell to agree to a vote on two gun-related amendments to an appropriations bill currently before the Senate.

It is not clear whether the amendments will pass when they come to a vote, now scheduled for Monday, but there will be heavy pressure mounted through the media and by Obama and Clinton, perhaps joined in this effort by the presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

The other would expand the current requirement that gun stores perform background checks on buyers to include gun shows, Internet sellers and other private sellers. If people on the watch list, now denied the right to board an airplane, are then denied the right to buy a gun, what comes next Should they be denied the right to vote What about the right to use the Internet, or drive a car The logic is inexorable, and in the event of new tragedies on the scale of Orlando, such demands will inevitably arise, and will be taken up by various factions in the reactionary political establishment in the United States.

The FBI watch list is a huge database, estimated at 800,000 names, and including, among the many well-publicized errors, a Republican congressman and a four-year-old boy, both from northern California. Another such lawsuit, sponsored by Islamic-American groups, is in federal court in Virginia. Others come from vengeful ex-spouses or people casting suspicion on Arab-Americans.

The statements by leading Democrats in support of the ban on gun purchases have been remarkably blunt in their anti-democratic thrust. In any case, no new laws would be required to arrest them. There are more than a few ironies in this statement. The AR-15 semi-automatic, which he condemned, is the civilian version of the same weapon that US soldiers use to mow down villagers in Afghanistan and Iraq.

As for terrorists having access to weapons, it is the United States and its allies who have funneled arms into Islamic fundamentalist organizations in Libya and Syria, first as part of the war against the government of Muammar Gaddafi, and then as part of the proxy war against the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad. The nearly 10,000 gun homicides a year represent a death toll greater than in many civil wars. El comunicado de prensa del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Costa Rica ver texto completo reproducido al final de esta nota precisa que.

Nótese que el Día Mundial del Ambiente y los días subsiguientes parecieran ser fechas muy esperadas por Costa Rica y Nicaragua en años recientes para proceder a realizar anuncios sobre temas de cierta relevancia.

The relevant material damage and the amount of compensation may be assessed by the Court only in separate proceedings. The Court is of the opinion that the Parties should engage in negotiation in order to reach an agreement on these issues.

Le Costa Rica est fondé à recevoir indemnisation pour les dommages matériels découlant des violations dont la Cour a constaté la commission par le Nicaragua. Documento oficial presentado en Casa Presidencial en Costa Rica. Al extremo derecho, Isla Portillos circulo en rojo realizado por el autor ya que no se distingue mayormente en razón de la escala usada.

La ausencia de cumbre entre Presidentes después de leerse un fallo del juez de La Haya entre Costa Rica y Nicaragua también se verificó después del fallo del 13 de julio del sobre derechos de navegación y derechos conexos. El mínimo anteriormente indicado corresponde a procedimientos en los que no se presentan incidentes procesales.

En el caso de la demanda de Nicaragua contra Colombia en materia de delimitación marítima presentada en el , el fallo de la CIJ se leyó tan solo en noviembre del , después de una serie de incidentes procesales excepciones preliminares presentadas por Colombia en el y solicitudes de intervención de Costa Rica y de Honduras del , ambas rechazadas.

La jurisprudencia internacional ofrece pocos casos en materia de daño ambiental causado por un Estado a otro Estado Nota 3.

En Centroamérica, no existe una metodología regional aceptada en materia de cuantificación del daño ambiental, por lo que es posible que ambos Estados cuenten con herramientas técnicas distintas.

Esta sentencia fue apelada por lo que, al momento de redactar estas breves líneas, no se tiene certeza que este monto se mantenga.

Costa Rica formaliza ante Nicaragua su pretensión de indemnización. Este 7 de junio, Costa Rica dio a conocer a Nicaragua su pretensión de indemnización por los daños resultantes de sus actividades ilícitas en Isla Portillos, de conformidad con la sentencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia del 16 de diciembre de La formalización de la pretensión costarricense fue realizada por el Embajador de Costa Rica en el Reino de los Países Bajos, Sergio Ugalde, al Embajador nicaragüense, Carlos Arguello, en La Haya, mediante la presentación de documentos que detallan los diferentes rubros que Costa Rica considera que Nicaragua le debe indemnizar.

El monto total de lo reclamado supera los seis millones de dólares, en donde se contempla la valoración monetaria del daño ambiental ocasionado por Nicaragua, así como una serie de gastos adicionales en los que Estado costarricense debió incurrir en relación con las acciones de Nicaragua, incluyendo su presencia militar en Isla Portillos, así como los daños por la excavación de caños y la tala de bosque en un humedal internacionalmente protegido bajo la Convención de Ramsar sobre Humedales.

La Cancillería costarricense lideró la preparación del reclamo que se realizó en el periodo de seis meses, posterior al fallo de la CIJ.

Por otro lado, la determinación del valor monetario del daño ambiental ocasionado por Nicaragua estuvo a cargo de la Fundación Neotrópica, la cual donó su trabajo al Estado costarricense como una contribución a este proceso de interés nacional. In South Korea, temporary employees usually work full-time with lower wages and very little compensation for hard jobs. After two years of employment, these temporary employees are either supposed to be promoted to positions with permanent employment or to be permanently contracted in their current position after two years of temporary employment.

Corporate employers in South Korea, however, typically violate this obligation. Both men were fired by KIA Motors as soon as they started their roof-top sit-in to bring attention to the conditions of temporary employees in South Korea.

Diary on the Roof — part 1. Nevertheless, they do have a certain commonality of interests, for otherwise NATO would have long fallen apart. Given the problem at hand, the various and disparate military measures undertaken by the Russian Federation in the last couple of years that have been chronicled in various issues of the Russia Defense Report should be viewed as pieces of a larger puzzle. Is this approach, now at least two years in the offing, working It is about waging aggressive warfare overseas, empowering the domestic police state, and electing a warmongering President.

Further, she observes that propagandizing the public includes films i. When people are shocked by a real or man-made event, they can be easily manipulated to support wars, or neoliberal market schemes, or any number of toxic agendas.

The intended reaction of the operation is that the synthetic terror event will induce people to seek protection from the state, coupled with aggressive war to bomb the threat out of existence. The solution, or intended result, is already occurring. Engineered fear and racism have set the stage for the public to be manipulated to accept a covert agenda that it would otherwise reject. The police state apparatus, War Inc.

They omit that their specialty is making sure propaganda is added to the informational flow we all depend on. A rational mindset will reject the racism, hatred, and warmongering which are intended off-shoots of these terror events.

Each country will be reinforced by a battalion. The battalions will be under the orders of NATO commanders, and formally deployed on a rotational basis rather than being based permanently in the host countries, but coverage will be continuous and the presence will be maintained permanently.

The new force is expected to total about 4,000 soldiers, with contributions from other allies. Germany is likely to deploy to Lithuania, the United States to Poland and Britain to Estonia, on a six-to-nine month rotating basis. Canada is expected to command a fourth battalion in Latvia.

Other NATO nations will eventually take command responsibilities. France is also sending a company of about 250 troops. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said at the June 14 meeting that the alliance is considering a Romanian offer to command a multinational brigade which could coordinate alliance training and possibly play a deterrent role. Romania has offered to provide the headquarters for the brigade and is expected to lead the formation.

Hamid el mardi حميد المرضي - Écouter et Télécharger GRATUITEMENT en format MP3

In addition, the United States will increase its military presence in Eastern Europe by deploying an armored brigade. The Army will repair and upgrade its already pre-positioned arms and place them at sites in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany.

Those stocks will be sufficient for another armored brigade to fall in on. The rotating brigade will bring its own equipment. The rotation period will be limited to nine months. An armored brigade combat team comprises about 4,200 troops and includes approximately 250 tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Paladin self-propelled howitzers, plus 1,750 wheeled vehicles.

Album Music marocain de Hamid el Mardi: écouter en streaming et télécharger en MP3. Artiste Hamid El Mardi: biographie et mp3 de Hamid El Mardi. Date de sortie: 09 Avril T wanted choisis ton destin T miracle Cheikh Abdel hamid mouhajer muhajer muslim vérité chiite . Téléchargement en MP3 des musiques de Hamid El Mardi.

The arguments of NATO officials saying the forces will deploy on temporary basis do not hold water. Actually, stationing forces abroad under the pretext of holding exercises cannot be done on a non-rotational basis anyway, because each unit has an operational cycle that envisions going through exercises. The announced plans are nothing else but a permanent military presence of substantial forces.

The document has played a very important role in the relationship for 19 years. Poland and the Baltic States are attempting to build a regional anti-aircraft missile shield. It will have to deploy additional military aircraft and Iskander missile systems closer to the border. His stance has a lot of supporters in the US. The negative development of events is seen as a provocation by Moscow to reduce any chances of a dialogue within the framework of Russia-NATO Council.

The stand-off will trigger an arms race. The inspection June is carried out at a number of weapons and hardware storage facilities, as well as individual military control agencies.

Something we do in hundreds and hundreds of cases all across the country. We then interviewed him twice. He admitted making the statements that his co-workers reported, but explained that he did it in anger because he thought his co-workers were discriminating against him and teasing him because he was Muslim.

In two cases that unfolded just last years, FBI informants would be revealed to have helped plan attacks with suspects, suggest to suspects that they credit ISIS for the attacks as reported by the Intercept, and even helped them in procuring weapons and explosives before finally arresting them. The results of such investigations are often high-profile counterterrorism news stories portraying the investigations as having stopped real attacks.

The FBI often opens these cases when suspects with questionable mental health make statements online or to friends, family, or co-workers indicating possible support for terrorist groups or terroristic aspirations. Comments could range from claims of belonging to a terrorist group or expressing a dislike of or a desire to cause harm to certain groups. Instead of recognizing a potentially dangerous, mentally unstable individual and getting them the help they need, the FBI instead proceeds with a process of entrapping them.

They work often for months posing as terrorists, gaining the trust of the suspect, and leading them through elaborate, scripted terror plots. They also handed him a detonator he attempted to trigger twice before finally being arrested. During the year-long investigation, El Khalifi detonated explosives at a quarry in the capital region with undercover operatives. He is not believed to be affiliated with al-Qaeda, officials said.

One can only speculate what — over the course of 10 months — undercover FBI informants said and did with Orlando shooting suspect Omar Mateen and how that may have contributed to his final act of violence years later. It is possible that contact with undercover informants posing as extremists may have radicalized or at the very least, planted the seeds for the violence Mateen would eventually carry out years later.

So far, the FBI refuses to make the details of their previous investigations public. Instead of attempting to hitch our own various personal political causes to this tragedy, make it a priority instead to pursue and demand the truth.

The villains we think we fear may pale in comparison to what may have truly sparked this tragedy — and exposing it may be the key to preventing the next tragedy. War and regime change are the intended result. Islamic jihadism is anathema to Eritrea, whose population of six million on the shores of the Red Sea is about evenly divided between Muslims and Christians.